S&P 5007,818.93▲ record, Oct 6Shiller CAPE41.62nd-highest ever10-yr Treasury5.36%▲ 24-yr highFed funds3.75–4.00%▲ hike, Sep 16Brent crude$105.69Oct 13Q3 EPS growth, est.+29.6%FactSetTop-10 weight39%of S&P 500Implied ERP4.20%Damodaran, Oct 1Nvidia~$5.8trnmarket value0DTE share59%SPX options, 2025Active funds lagging79%large-cap, 2025U.S. real return6.6%/yr1900–2025
An independent news journalفارسی

What FedNow’s growth asks of banks

Payment volumes rose 27.6% in the third quarter. Banks still have to price, reconcile and support the services they build around instant settlement

By Kourosh Marashi3 min read
A coin shoots through a glass tube between two bank buildings under a night sky
Illustration: The Kourosh Review

Use of America’s public instant-payment network is growing quickly. FedNow settled 6.38 million customer credit transfers worth $370.9 billion in the third quarter of 2026, according to Federal Reserve statistics updated on October 20th. Compared with the second quarter, payment numbers rose 27.6% and their value increased 35%.

The figures do not show how widely activity is distributed among banks, businesses and households. Transfer counts cannot establish the number of distinct customers. A business moving money regularly can generate many transactions; a newly connected bank may initially generate few. The useful question for financial institutions is how to turn a working connection into a service customers choose repeatedly.

FedNow is infrastructure supplied through participating financial institutions. The Federal Reserve describes it as allowing businesses and individuals to send and receive money in real time throughout the year, with recipients gaining immediate access to funds. Its baseline use cases include account-to-account transfers and bill payments. It is consequently a means for banks to supply a service, rather than a replacement for the customer relationship.

The price of a finished service

Two banks connected to the same infrastructure can still offer different approval workflows, accounting links and customer support. A finance department wants to know which invoice was paid and whether an exception needs attention. The speed of settlement helps, but a fast transfer with poor records can still leave expensive administrative work behind. For banks, those surrounding services offer ways to compete even when the underlying settlement infrastructure is shared.

The network’s pricing also separates transmission from the finished service. The 2026 fee schedule lists a standard customer-credit-transfer origination charge of 4.5 cents, with an offset for up to 2,500 such transfers per month. The general participation fee is discounted to zero during 2026. The schedule prices a bank’s use of the Federal Reserve service. Customer charges are a separate decision for the financial institution.

Integration, authorisation and the handling of problems still require resources. A small per-message price therefore tells little by itself about the total cost of delivering payments. Equally, a bank cannot assume that customers will value every fast payment at the same price. Urgency, ease of reconciliation and the alternatives available will shape what the service is worth.

Payments after office hours

Continuous payments also require attention to time. FedNow’s published operating schedule covers weekends and Federal Reserve holidays. Its funds-transfer business day rolls over at approximately 7:01 p.m. Eastern time, without interrupting message processing. The schedule separately notes that some activities may be unavailable outside standard business days. Banks must account for the difference between continuous payment processing and the hours available for supporting activities.

For a bank, accounting dates and customer expectations need to agree. A payment made after an office has closed must still be recognised correctly and handled through a dependable process if it needs investigation. Around-the-clock availability creates a reasonable expectation that the bank can explain the payment’s status outside ordinary office hours.

There are limits to what the quarterly figures can say about that business opportunity. They cover settled customer credit transfers, rather than every type of message the network carries. Average payment value was $58,161 in the third quarter; that average cannot reveal a typical household transaction or establish which business use cases drove growth. A complete account of adoption would need more detail about the distribution of activity.

For a participating bank, rising volumes strengthen the reason to examine the service around each transfer. Which customers need immediate settlement, what approvals do they require, and how will they reconcile the result? The answers determine the product and its cost. The Federal Reserve’s quarterly totals show a growing network; the economics of each bank’s offering depend on the work those totals cannot describe.

Subscribe to the journal · Free

The week, explained

Every Friday, a five-minute briefing on the stories that moved markets and the economy, from The Kourosh Review.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.